Locke is a brave film, one that takes a refreshing level of
risk to tell a story. It is an account of 90 minutes in the life of Ivan Locke
(Tom Hardy), a manager on a construction site, as he drives to London on the
motorway one night. His interactions with other people come almost exclusively
over the phone, attempting to deal with one crisis after another as a carefully
maintained life begins to fall apart.
Any film that makes the decision to only use one on-screen
character in its entire run time is gambling. It gambles on the audiences
focus, it gambles on the story it is trying to tell and most crucially it is
gambling on the performance that HAS to hold it all together.
In that final aspect especially, Locke is a gamble that pays
off. Tom Hardy is superb, gripping the audience’s attention throughout (partly
due to an occasionally jarring accent admittedly). It’s a consciously un-showy
performance, one that focuses on subtle body language and the occasional
emphatically delivered swear word to communicate a much deeper well of emotion.
The cinematography is impressive throughout, making the
British motorway system look as beautiful as it perhaps ever has. Playing
around with the way street lights and other cars illuminate a night drive,
Locke manages to remain visually interesting despite its deliberately limited
scope.
For a film that deals with a number of highly fraught emotional
issues, it also benefits from resisting the temptation for melodrama, keeping
the most intense conversations short and communicating an awful lot of pain in
a minimum of words. It carries an emotional punch precisely because the film
maintains the same level of emotional control that it’s central character
strives to achieve.
As I hope previous entries on this blog have made clear, I
adore big budget blockbusters and over the top action, but I also appreciate
films that attempt to do a lot with very little and Locke is a great example of
this.
It could undoubtedly have worked as a TV special, it’s budget and scope
easily within the abilities of Channel 4
(who’s film wing partly funded the film), but I love breaking up the epic films
with something like this, which uses the big screen and the immersion of the
cinema to draw you into a much more grounded story.
No comments:
Post a Comment